E-Execution in Administrative Justice: Prospects and Challenges for Indonesia Legal System Nasrullah (a), Aqil Syahru Akram (b), Sonny Zulhuda (c), Muhammad Ajmal Qolfathriyuus (d), Muhammad Alim Kamil (e)
(a) Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(b,d) Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
(c) Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyah of Law, International Islamic University Malaysia
(e) Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Abstract
The integration of digital technology into judicial processes has emerged as a strategic response to the demand for more efficient, transparent, and accessible justice systems. In Indonesia^s State Administrative Court (PTUN), the concept of electronic execution (e-execution) offers a potential solution to long-standing procedural inefficiencies in enforcing final court decisions. This article conceptualizes e-execution as a transformative legal innovation, outlining its functional framework and alignment with the principles of administrative justice. The discussion emphasizes potential benefits such as accelerated procedural timelines, reduced administrative costs, enhanced transparency through real-time monitoring, and improved access to justice, especially for remote communities. However, the study also identifies key challenges, including cybersecurity and data privacy risks, disparities in digital literacy, fragmented regulatory frameworks, infrastructural limitations, and institutional resistance to change. Using normative legal research, this study examines existing legal provisions, court regulations, and doctrinal perspectives to assess the readiness of Indonesia^s legal system for e-execution implementation. The findings underscore the need for a comprehensive and harmonized legal framework, supported by capacity-building programs and technological interoperability, to ensure that e-execution can be effectively integrated into Indonesia^s administrative justice system while safeguarding due process and public trust.
Keywords: E-Execution, Administrative Justice, Digital Judiciary, Legal Reform
Topic: Legal Frameworks for Inclusive Digital Transformation
