Virtual reality in the Philippines: Facilitators and perceived barriers of virtual reality as a therapeutic tool in the clinical setting Brent Adams S. Eliasos1, Betina Alexandra N. Decada1, John Paul R. De Guia1, Julian D. Rafanan1, Virginie Mae I. Inuman1, Aira Jannelle I. Revuelto1, Maybelle Anne Zamora1, Justine Vincent DT. Ramos2, Maritoni M. Pablo3, Arthur SP Calces4, Angelica T. Fernandez5
Our Lady of Fatima University
Abstract
Background: Virtual Reality (VR) is an emerging therapeutic intervention in physical therapy practice in the Philippines. This study aims to explore the perceived barriers and limitations of a handheld virtual reality as a physiotherapeutic tool.
Methodology: The study employed a qualitative phenomenological study using a semi-structured interview conducted using Zoom platform. A snowball sampling was utilized to gather informants in the study. Coding was utilized to classify themes and subthemes after data transcription. Codes were analyzed using Collaizi Method through QDA Miner Lite. Theoretical triangulation was utilized to support the themes from the answers of the informants.
Results: Ten licensed physical therapists who have previous experiences in using handheld virtual reality devices (such as the Nintendo Wii, Xbox, etc.) participated. Data saturation was reached after the sixth interview. Nine out of ten (90%) informants believed that the primary barrier to VR use is the high cost of the console and the setup required for the VR room. The following themes likewise emerged: barriers (expensiveness, atypical practice), limitations (short-term functional effect, level of comprehension required to understand VR), and advantages (entertaining and usefulness to neurological and musculoskeletal cases). Furthermore, majority of participants held the opinion that, in order to stay up with the rapidly advancing field of healthcare technology, the healthcare industry^s present practices need to integrate technology more.
Discussion: The clinical impact of VR is already established from the currently available research. The demands of the patients and therapists, however, take precedence above the ease of technological adaptation. These must be addressed in order to lessen the differences between their problem and the characteristics of this exciting technology. Additionally, lawmakers and healthcare administrators must support rehabilitation medicine in their ef
