Monitoring and Evaluation of Lectures during the Covid-19 Pandemic Period as a Part of Education Quality Assurance
Bertha Yonata- Guntur Trimulyono- Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan- Dian Savitri- Nugrahani Primary Putri- Enny Susiyawati- Fida Rachmadiarti- Madlazim

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

One of the tasks of the three pillars (Tri Dharma) of Higher Education is Education which includes learning. Learning is one part that must get attention with clear quality assurance because it has been stated in Article 1 Point 20 of the Law. No. 20 concerning the 2003 National Education System. In a university environment, the interaction occurs between students and lecturers with a student-centered learning process. Maintaining the quality of education (in this case learning) is one of the important agendas in ensuring the quality of higher education, one of which is through monitoring and evaluation. Implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation of learning is carried out routinely every semester, activities in monitoring and evaluation are observing conformity or non-conformity in 3 learning stages, namely the preparation stage, implementation stage, and evaluation stage in all majors / study programs. During the Covid 19 pandemic, learning monitoring and evaluation activities were carried out online using a platform that was easy to implement. There are 3 monitoring and evaluation observer for each course and one of them is the head of the study program. The monitoring and evaluation instruments are filled out by each supervisory officer (as an observer). In addition to observing teaching and learning activities and learning documents, monitoring and evaluation observer also interviewed students to check the findings. During four semesters starting from the 2nd semester of 2019-2020 to the 1st semester of 2021-2022, the biggest discrepancy was found at the evaluation stage. Every finding of non-conformance is followed up at the study program level with the involvement of the head of the study program, even at the faculty level with the involvement of the dean or vice dean of academic affairs.

Keywords: Monitoring and Evaluation, Quality Assurance, Conformity, Non-Conformity

Topic: Universal Quality Education