Saya memahami dalam konteks hukum pidana, pidana itu sesungguhnya bukanlah
tujuan utama, tetapi adalah tujuan terakhir. Untuk itu dalam konteks artikel ini
saya ingin mendapat penjelasan seberapa penting isu pidana mati dianggat dalam
kasus korupsi?
Replies:
Terima kasih atas pertanyaan nya, menurut saya penting. Isu pidana mati diangkat karena di beberapa negara salah satunya Cina itu sangat efektif memberikan efek jera bagi pelakunya. Serta UU tipikor telah mengatur dan memberlakukan tindak pidana, namun pelaksaan pasal tersebut tentang hukuman mati juga belum pernah dilaksanakan sampai saat ini.
Thank you for the question, I think it^s important. The issue of capital punishment was raised because in several countries, one of which China was very effective in providing a deterrent effect on the perpetrators. As well as the Corruption Law has regulated and enforced criminal acts, but the implementation of this article regarding the death penalty has never been implemented to date.
1. What are the factors that influence someone who commits a criminal act of
corruption?
2. Do you think that the death penalty will be effective in creating a deterrent
effect on someone from committing a criminal act of corruption?
Replies:
Thank you for such a great question, what i think is:
1. There are internal and external factors. One of the internal factor regarding morals and lifestyle. While the external factors is from the legal side: the existence of legal rules regarding Corruption but weak law enforcement efforts and unclear legal formulations including regarding article 2 paragraph 2 in the Corruption Law regarding this death penalty.
2. I think death penalty is very effective to provide a deterrent effect. Seeing that so far there has never been a corruption perpetrator who has been sentenced to death so that corruption is widespread.
I hope it^s answer your question. Thank you very much
